View Single Post
  #31  
Old 10th May 2016
Harold Gough Harold Gough is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Reading UK
Posts: 5,628
Thanks: 56
Thanked 781 Times in 712 Posts
Likes: 40
Liked 3,089 Times in 1,663 Posts
Re: Communal flowers, trees, plants and fungi thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by art frames View Post
Probably wise as you will spend a lot of time fiddling with processing Raw.

You can process in ways which make things less contrasty which tends to flatten the tonal range and remove harsh edges. Similarly you can reduce the presence (clarity and colour vibrance) in a number of ways. If you do it in subtle ways and in selected areas you can chose the areas of focus by reducing the viewers interest in the non focus areas. Selective sharpening can also be helpful but only if well managed. I find most sharpening is used harshly.

The end result should not look processed. I am not looking to create unreality.

My training is as an artist / illustrator. And a painter I select exactly how I want you to view an image by composition, paint quality and edge treatment (amongst other techniques). I simply use the same thinking when I develop a photograph. Changing the content and composition at the taking stage, if possible and then developing in ways which help it later on. In the end all there is is the image. That is all you are exhibiting.

Interestingly I paint less now than I did - but still do both. But people viewing drawings and paintings are more impressed than with photographs. I think it is assumed that there is less skill, because the machine takes the image.
Thanks, Peter,

Not my usual scene, although I have softened images on occasion.

I abandoned Unsharp Mask years ago because it is so coarse. I am using Smart Sharpen and High Pass at times.

Harold
__________________
The body is willing but the mind is weak.
Reply With Quote