PDA

View Full Version : Laowa 15mm 1:1 macro


Harold Gough
17th May 2016, 03:12 PM
This has only been around for a little while. When I learned that the WD was <5mm at 1:1 I discounted it for practical use.

Then I saw the images by orionmystery:

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1422378

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1427036

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1425346

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1421849

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1420966

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1430529

So I invested in one. The lens is designed for full frame cameras and this will be my Sony Alpha A7R. However, I was also interested in how it would act (as a 30mm) on my m4/3 EM-1. The adapter for that went missing, only to turn up today, so no images so far.

I have had some success with the A7R, at about 0.4:1. I have even shot some crosseye stereos. The idea of this lens is to include sharp(ish)background, rather than to isolate the subject with shallow DOF. So the clutter is intentional, for demonstration purposes.

A tree paeony, about the size of my hand, by diffuse daylight, hand-held at f22.

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/77/1297677.jpg

A crosseye stereo:

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/75/1297675.jpg

An orchid by TTL flash.

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/99/1290599.jpg

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/00/1290600.jpg

A crop of one of the images:

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/03/1290603.jpg

Harold

pandora
29th May 2016, 10:15 PM
I think the benefits of this lens are manifest, Harold. Personally I prefer the deeper dof of that lens for floral subjects over recessive focus.

I especially like the result you got with the tree peony, although referring to a reply you made on my Kakadu Jabaroo thread, perhaps a tad too sharp to be seen as "impressionistic" don't you think?

Harold Gough
30th May 2016, 06:21 AM
I think the benefits of this lens are manifest, Harold. Personally I prefer the deeper dof of that lens for floral subjects over recessive focus.

I especially like the result you got with the tree peony, although referring to a reply you made on my Kakadu Jabaroo thread, perhaps a tad too sharp to be seen as "impressionistic" don't you think?

Mark,

It would be hopeless for any skittish fauna (my main subjects) but there is much to explore, once I get some balance lighting for 1:1.

My original main interest was flowers and I return to them from time to time.

If you saw my rejects you would see the impressionist look OK.

Harold